Editorial policy
SaaSNivo’s editorial standard is to help readers understand what a product offers, where it falls short and who it may suit. Clear reasoning and relevant evidence should support any recommendation.
Facts, research and opinion
Product facts should be supported by identifiable sources. Opinions and recommendations should be distinguishable from those facts. Claims of hands-on testing require a completed evaluation; research based on documentation should be described as research.
Scores and comparisons
Ratings use a ten-point scale and should be explained in the accompanying assessment. Comparisons should identify the products and plans involved, use consistent criteria and acknowledge meaningful trade-offs.
Commercial relationships
Affiliate relationships must be disclosed. A commercial relationship must not determine a score, suppress a relevant limitation or turn a marketing claim into an unsupported editorial conclusion. Read our affiliate disclosure for how these links work.
Corrections and product changes
To flag an inaccurate or outdated detail, email infos@saasnivo.com. Include the page URL, the statement concerned and a reliable supporting source so the issue can be reviewed.
Read the methodology →